The philosophy of hiring

In Plato's "Apology", Socrates stands trial for his life in front of the Athenians and has the opportunity to speak and defend himself against the accusations of Meletus. During that defense, he does not beg or flatter the judges. He educates them, and throughout time, us as well. One of the things we learn from that speech comes from a beautiful phrase:

"Wealth does not bring excellence, but excellence brings wealth and all other public and private blessings for men."

I won't attempt to create a new meaning out of what Socrates wanted to say, but it reminds me of the human tendency to pursue the visible, measurable, tangible, and comfortable proxy of wealth, status, and appearances, instead of the harder, less tangible thing that actually produces it: clarity of purpose, excellence of character, and the discipline to pursue what truly matters.

This is what Socrates, and later Plato, called "arete":

Virtue. The pursuit of one's highest function. The good work, done well, consistently, and for the right reasons.

Unfortunately, Socrates ended up sentenced to death 😩...but I want to draw a parallel between his phrase and hiring. Some philosophy purists might find this repelling, but I feel like I can't miss the opportunity to preach since the parallel holds uncomfortably well.

Wealth does not bring excellence, but excellence brings wealth. Replace "wealth" with tools, frameworks, the latest technology, and elaborate evaluation systems. Replace "excellence" with a clear hiring philosophy: what kind of people you are looking for, why they matter, what they would accomplish in the role, and how to consistently go find them.

Most companies invest enormous wealth (money, time, energy...) in the mechanics of hiring. The tools, the tech stack, the process improvements. And yet, results remain inconsistent. They hire well sometimes, poorly other times. They struggle to explain why either happened. The Socratic diagnosis is simple: They are pursuing the proxy instead of the thing itself. They are optimizing the appearance of a great hiring system without doing the harder work of building one.

What separates companies that hire extraordinarily well from those that don't is rarely the sophistication of their process or the power of their tools. It is almost always the clarity and consistency of their underlying beliefs about what great hiring actually means, and the discipline to hold onto those beliefs when volume, urgency, and pressure push in the opposite direction.

The Socratic recommendation would be this: if you want to hire great people consistently, build the philosophy first and the system second.

Philosophy is not abstract. It is a purpose. It is a set of principles that enables hiring excellence: convictions you commit to, refuse to compromise on, and that anchor every decision you make when building a hiring system.

Philosophy is the logic and the conviction that allow you to hire one extraordinary person, and then do it again, and again, and again.

What is the philosophy that enables the excellence that produces wealth? Here are seven ideas.

1. The job description is an ad, not a checklist.

Write job descriptions the way you would write an ad. Give top candidates a reason to pay attention. Top candidates are not looking for a list of requirements. They are looking for a description of a challenge worth solving, an opportunity worth considering, a company that clearly understands what it is doing and where it is going. A boring job description is not neutral. In a highly competitive market for top talent, boring is disqualifying!

2. Focus on defining what the job is, not on what the ideal candidate looks like.

A real job description should describe the job, not the person. Do not outline the ideal candidate. Instead, describe what the person will need to do, what challenges they will face, who they will work with, what they will need to achieve, and what success looks like at 6 months, 12 months, and 3 years. This distinction sounds simple, but it requires disciplined thinking before the search begins. It is very much worth it.

A good job definition changes everything! It changes who applies, how you interview, and how you make talent decisions.

3. Design everything around top talent.

The supply of top talent is structurally below demand. This is not a temporary market condition. It is a permanent fact about how top performance is distributed across any population. Design your recruiting processes, sourcing strategies, advertising campaigns, and interview frameworks for the top candidate, not the average candidate.

4. Look for performance.

Forget the clever questions and drop the innovative frameworks. The most valuable information you can gather about a candidate is a deep, structured understanding of their major accomplishments. Not what they did, but how they did it. Under what circumstances? What was hard? What did they learned?. What would they do differently?

Hints of real potential emerge from real accomplishments, not from clever answers to interview questions or hypothetical scenarios. Gather evidence of performance and potential, not great interviewing skills.

5. Hire for potential.

Hire people who are both competent and motivated to do the work. Do not stop at measuring competency. True motivation, drive, emotional intelligence, a learning attitude, and leadership are equally or more important than skills alone.

To assess true potential, you need to look for multiple examples where the person has excelled and examine the underlying environment and circumstances that surrounded that excellence.

Drive, learning agility, emotional intelligence, leadership, and genuine passion for the work are all visible in a person's history. Take the time to look.

6. Interviews are for collecting information, not for making decisions.

Two things must stay completely separate: the interview and the decision. In the interview, focus on collecting evidence. Design and plan interviews to gather information, not impressions. Emotions, first impressions, interpersonal chemistry, and the feeling that you "just know" are not evidence. They are noise.

Listen to what is actually being said, not how it is being said. Take notes, debrief with your team, and only then make the decision. This is the hardest discipline to maintain!

7. Recruiting is a competitive advantage, not an administrative function.

As competition for top talent intensifies, the companies that treat recruiting and hiring as a strategic capability will consistently outperform those that don't.

A strategic approach to hiring requires great recruiters:

Great recruiters: people with genuine consultative skills, a deep understanding of what great performance looks like in a role, structured interviewing ability rooted in evidence and job matching, and the capacity to fully engage hiring managers as genuine partners in the outcome.

These are the principles I follow to pursue excellence in hiring. The idea, at its core, is simple: adopt a philosophy first, then build the system.

Thank you for reading, and don't forget to subscribe if you want to know when the next post is out.